according to sulalatus salatin (the malay annals), a narrative records of Melaka Sultanate, there was a coup d'etat during the early establishment of this kingdom.
Sultan Muhammad Syah has many wives. So, the wife of royal blood has priority of her son to become heir of the throne. however when Sultan Muhammad Syah died, the heir of royal blood was still a minor, around 5 - 7 years of age, which obviously had no interest about ruling a kingdom or a government. At the same time, the late sultan has another elder son but not of royal blood wife, that was Raja Kassim.
The minor heir was installed as new king of Melaka as Parameswara Dewa Syah. His mother was Puteri Raja Rokan (Rokan was one of vassal state of Melaka). Since he was still a minor knowing nothing about the affairs of state administration, trading and protocols except playing with his peers and servants. Things became worst when the Raja of Rokan, father to Puteri Rokan as well as king's grandfather, take opportunity of his status as grandfather to become like an acting king of Melaka since the minor king was always in his arms (didokong) wherever the king was is there would be Raja Rokan.
The elder son of former king of another wife was Raja Kassim. His mother was of noblewoman with tamil muslim blood as her father was Dato' Mani Purindan a richman who claimed he's a royal blood from India who not been chosen to become king there and seek fortune in Melaka with all his households and followers and paid homage and loyalty to KIng of Melaka and become the King's subjects forever with all his households and followers, he came from southern india to Melaka and pledge loyalty to the King of Melaka and all his descendents will adopt all the customs, language and laws of Melaka forever.
Since Raja Kassim, eventhough he is older than the minor king, well-learned, sound knowledge of state's affairs and administrative and protocols, was not given the right to become King of Melaka and so he brought himself to live as ordinary people at port of Melaka, stay in his common people relatives and worked at port just like other commoners.
At the court Melaka, the minor king was just like a puppet and the real ruler was Raja Rokan his grandfather who sits on the throne with the king in his arms in the 'balai penghadapan' and 'balai rong seri'. Gradually these situations had caused some restless among the ministers, the officers and the knights who slowly realized that they were ruled by an acting king of a vassal state of Melaka, a tributary state it was. They all were in the state of dilemma.
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
itu kita kena tunggu dia punya father jalan, baru dia mau masuk Muslim mau jadi seperti Khalifah Umar Abd Aziz of Bani Umayyah.
kata itu mesti dikotakan maa, tuan yang terutama.
jangan main2 cakap haa..
----- Original Message -----
From: Shahrunizan
To: uum_with_hons@yahoogroups.com
Cc: gang ; syed idrus syed husain ; sherry
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit - Lim Guan Eng
Bagaimana pulak dengan Lim Guan Eng..? mungkin dia juagak layak sekarang ?....dia ada sebut dulu dia sanggup berkhatan (potong itu bawah)..kalau bapak dia dah jalann..
kat mana ntah ada baca statement nih...kekekeke..
--- On Wed, 7/2/08, fairuz <fairuz@mahsa.edu.my> wrote:
From: fairuz <fairuz@mahsa.edu.my>Subject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@yahoogroups.comCc: "gang" <3d215@yahoogroups.com>, "syed idrus syed husain" <siriuz_lebaran@yahoo.com>, "sherry" <sharifahidayu2000@yahoo.com>Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 9:21 AM
Nik Aziz meamang bagus, aku suka dia, Chedet pun bagus, aku suka dia gak
tapi kedua2nya (dua2 ekor tu sebenarnya geng), tapi pendapat sayalah yg bebal ni tak boleh rasanya nak pimpin negara lagi, faktor kesihatan & fizikal
for time being, I'll vote for Najib to continue what his father had not.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ahmad Ilmi Jasman
To: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:06 AM
Subject: RE: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
Aku sekali lagi nak share cerita ex-UTK yg jadi bos security tempat keje lama aku. Sebagai UTK, mission dia, SHOOT TO KILL atau ESCORT VVIP (PM / TPM dll). So dalam keje Escort mengescort nih, banyak kali juga dia mengescort Anwar. Nak dijadikan cerita, bila malam hari dekat hotel (kerja outstation) Anwar akan kata kat bodyguard UTK ni, “Datuk-datuk tak payah ikut saya. Duduk di hotel, saya ada hal sebentar”. Bila? Malam hari. Apa dia buat? Ntah tapi keluar hotel dgn bukan kereta rasmi ikut pintu belakang menyorok-nyorok. Yg biasanya dia buat, dia kata biasalah…. So, aku kenal bebenar org yg cerita ni, so 85% aku percaya. So… kita pikirlah sendiri.
Macam yg korang kata, minta Allah tunjukkan siapa yg melakukan kesalahan, mendapat balasannya & kita mendapat petunjuk untuk pemimpin yg benar-benar peminpin…
Pilihan aku…..
Che Det (tapi bagilah kat org lain pulak, sebab banyak kelemahan Che Det kita dah nampak)
So yg paling layak… Nik Aziz… cuba bayangkan ulama’ menjadi PM. Insyallah kadar maksiat di KL akan turun mendadak atau tiada maksiat dikalangan org Islam….
AHMAD ILMI JASMAN
Human Capital Department
Credit Guarantee Corporation Malaysia Berhad
& Tel : 603-7806 2300 ext 228
* Fax : 603-7806 3306 / 7804 9802
8 E-Mail : ilmi@cgc.com. my
: Web site : www.iguarantee. com.my
-----Original Message-----From: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:uum_ with_hons@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of al hairilSent: Tuesday, 01 July, 2008 9:04 PMTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
Entahlah... Jan... semoga Allah menunjukkan siapa dia sebenarnya.. . kalau dia betul baik. maka tunjukkan jalan yg baik utk dia, tapi kalau dia sebaliknya semoga dia bertaubat dan kembali ke pangkal jalan...--- On Tue, 7/1/08, jan ahmad wrote:
From: jan ahmadSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comDate: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 8:54 PM
bagi aku lak...tindakan anwar adalah strategi dia yang mungkin dianggap bijak..dia berjaya menarik perhatian dunia..kemudiannya mendapat jaminan akan keselamatan dia daripada kerajaan..dulu dia di tangkap kemudiannya di pukul oleh Ketua Polis Negara..jadi dia mempunyai sebab untuk berbuat demikian...kalau nak cakap Liberal Islamist ni..ada ka istilah macam tu..mcm fundamentalist islam..atau selainnya..sebab yang aku tahu hanya islam...tak ada hadharinya.. .
----- Original Message ----From: al hairilTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comSent: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 7:43:20 PMSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
Kalau kita baca karangan Hishamudin Rais tu mungkin kita percaya Anwar tak buat benda nie.. tapi biasanya kalau dia tak bersalah dia patutnya tak lari menyorok mcm skrg ni dan bagi alasan bukan2...
Masalahnya kita nampak Anwar ni skrg tak macam Anwar masa muda2 dulu, gaya cakapnya, visinya , "keadilannya " dah tak best mcm masa dia student dulu atau masa awal2 dlm bidang politik tu dulu..
Anwar skrg lebih adalah model Liberal Islamist oleh Amerika.. jadi hati kecil aku tetap berkata kalau takde angin masakan pokok boleh bergoyang...
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, Azlan Abd Malik wrote:
From: Azlan Abd MalikSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comDate: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 6:05 PM
Pokok pangkalnya jgn laaa meng idola kan pemimpin....
Saya dah tak nak meng idolakan Tun Mahathir lagi kerna tebukti dia ni banyak membawa kehancuran kpd umat Melayu kerna melayan nafsu2 si bodoh-bodoh Melayu-melayu yang dapat jawatan dalam UMNO
Ada jawatan ada fulus ...pirahhhh
Saya pun tak nak meng idola kan Anwar Ibrahim kerna kalau dia bersalah biarlaah dia dihukum oleh Allah...kita manusia tiada hak untuk menghakimi mutlak akhlak orang
Dulu dia pun sama terbabit dalam political game kerna nak melawan kroni2 mamak medey
Kita tak usah jd hipokrit sangat nak pemimpin yang betul2 mulia...kalau nak ekstrem tahap mulia ni haaaa kita pilih Nik Aziz...haa menngeletar org2 yang kaya sbb makan duit rakyat ni,.... sbb dah tak boleh pukul langsung duit rakyat,... baru padan muka...
kalau tak aku rasa kalau Anwar ni mungkin dia akan guna otak rasional lebih skit laaa
Kalau dia pun sama macam pak Lah jugak haaaa kan ramai org2 BN kita boley mintak tolong kasi jatuh balik.. Apa nak risau....... Polis ada (Ketua Polis kan dulu pernah kautem dgn org BN apa nak susah)
Apa? Anwar ejen kuasa Asing, kroni US...yea ke?
Bahya...mmg bahya tapi org yang dia lawan tu pun lagi teruk ...
Tak usah jd paku dulang paku serpih...
Tanya laa Daim Zainuddin... dia yg bagi bos dia George Soros kayee....sbb hilang pertaruhan duit pakai Bank Negara dulu..kakakaka
Lepas tu Soros ada cukup fund belasah laa kita negara Asia ciput ni bg kita miskin
Heyyy... Siasat betul2 dulu apsal Anwar Ibrahim dipecat..... ......
Yea ke ejen asing... kalau betul pengkhianat negara jatuhkanlaaa hukuman gantung atau firing squad barulahhh keadilan yang sebenarnya..
Takut pulakkk
--- On Tue, 1/7/08, jan ahmad wrote:
From: jan ahmadSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comDate: Tuesday, 1 July, 2008, 5:18 PM
sayang sokong encik tizry..saya pun bukan sokong anwar..tapi ini fitnah bab liwat kes besar ni
----- Original Message ----From: Saharudin Mohd DanTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comSent: Tuesday, July 1, 2008 4:58:20 PMSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
..saya berpendapat anwar ibrahim bukanlah seorang sodom..
tetapi beliau adalah mangsa konspirasi politik negara..
inilah perkembangan tidak sihat yang telah mula menular ke dalam politik Malaysia, bila fitnah telah mula berkuasa, manakala kedaulatan dan kesucian undang-undang negara telah mula goyah dan tidak mempunyai integriti yang kukuh dan berwibawa.
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, bad lalih wrote:
From: bad lalihSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comDate: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 1:51 AM
Tuan-tuan semua, bagi saya kes saudara Anwar dituduh membontot orang bukanlah perkara pelik sekiranya ianya benar-benar berlaku.Berkemungki nan saudara Anwar kita mengidap penyakit yang kadang2 datang perasaan yg tidak normal utk membuat perkara terkutuk itu, penyakit ini bila datang menyerang, orang itu tidak akan dapat menahan, meskipun dia orang yg kuat beribadat.Umpama kita terasa lapar, makan aje la ubatnya. Atau byk kes lain seperti mat gian yg dtg gian sanggup buat apa saje utk menghilangkan gian, kes org2 kaya tapi sering mencuri benda2 kecil disupermarket, kes maknyah,pondan yg menjual tubuh,bukan salah mereka kerana mereka dilahirkan cacat nafsu..atau yg mcm lelaki macho tapi gay...mereka2 ini cacat nafsu dan berpenyakit yg hanya dapat diubati bila dapat 'menikmati' apa yg dihajati Walaupun solat dapat menghindari kerja2 terkutuk ini, namun penyakit ini bila datang menyerang insan2 ini gagal bertahan, namun jika mereka mengabaikan solat, maka lagi parah la penyakit mereka dan makin kerap membuat onar jika dibandingkan dgn mereka yg rajin bersolat. Saya sendiri pernah melihat seorang insan yg berserban dan solat malam, namun telah melakukan onar terhadap rakan saya di dalam masjid...masyaallah . Banyak juga kes ustaz maupun imam yg merogol anak gadis sedangkan mereka tidak mengabaikan solat...
Mungkin juga saudara Anwar pernah terlibat dimasa lampau,namun masih ada pihak yg mahu mengungkit utk tujuan politik. Jika benar, saya pun tak bersetuju waima perkara tersebut berlaku 20 30 thn yg lampau...saya tak rela bakal PM kita pernah menyodom org,nanti org2 asing berkata"PM M'sia mat bontot". Walaupun tidak benar,saya masih tidak bersetuju beliau menjadi PM kerana segelintir org masih berkata dan menuduh beliau mat sodom. Ramai lagi yg layak jadi PM.
Jalan penyelesaian bagi kes ini, saya syorkan Saudara Anwar bersumpah dgn menjunjung Al-Quran dan dibuat secara live di TV utk menafikan perkara ini dengan menyatakan yg beliau tidak pernah melakukan seks diluar tabii sepanjang hayatnya...then baru saya sokong dia jadi PM.Wallahualam. ...--- On Tue, 7/1/08, fairuz wrote:
From: fairuzSubject: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Part 2To: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com, "gang" <3d215@yahoogroups.>, "syed idrus syed husain" , "sherry" Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 2:28 PM
tapi bila tengok anwar punya melatah kadang2 kelakar gak, semua orang dia mau kasi babit
moral of the story
Bila u fitnah orang dgn bukti yg dangkal, tapi orang tu selamba ajer, rileks tak melatah,
tapi Bila u pulak kena fitnah sikit je, budak 23tahun, punya kelamkabut bagai nak rak, kalau buleh satu dunia nak kena tahu.
Kita ambil lah pelajaran dari kes anwar ni. Allah SWT memberi tanda2 kekuasaannya dan membalasnya dengan kehendakNya untuk kita rakyat malaysia tengok untuk difikirkan.
berani kerana benar
takut kerana salah
pulang paku buah keras
Stone
----- Original Message -----
From: Safiallah Zakaria
To: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: FW: Sodo Mee - Part 2
Sumpah lawak...Safiallah Zakaria Mobile:- +6012-283 1494 Alt. Email:- safi_zakaria@ yahoo.com
Betul-betul filem Melayu. Turun lokasi dulu kemudian baru buat skrip dan cari pelakon extra. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita. Hidup PDRM... oops Hidup FINAS. DARI JELEBU Alamak gua dengar filem Sodo Me karya Brad Pittail akan di buat lagi. Sodo Mee Part 2 ini akan dibuat dengan lebih gempaq. Gua dengar dengan sahih si pengarah Brad Pittail sudah mulakan penggambaran. Iklan-iklan telah bocor di akhbar-akhbar. Pelakon utama telah ditemui.Dengar-dengar nya filem Part Two ini amat gah TETAPI lokasinya masih belum di tentukan. Inilah standard filem Melayu. Leceh. Kata nak buat filem gempaq. Lokasi pun belum jumpa. Bila di tanya Brad Pittail di mana lokasi tempat Sodo Mee terjadi, dia berkata: lokasinya berlaku di dalam kondo di Jalan Pantai, di kondo di Jalan Bangsar dan di kondo Damansara dan terus ke kondo Segambut. In best punya Sodo Mee beb. Makan tak habis.Woit! Ada berapa ribu kondo di sana? Yang mana satu kondo yang betul. Ini nampaknya bukan filem Sodo Mee Part Two. Kalau kondo panjang-panjang dan nama kondo pun tidak jelas ini samalah seperti kempen undilah Shahrizat Gadis Pilihanku. Biar betul Kalau macam itu baik cakap Sodo Mee ini berlaku di semua kondo-kondo di Kuala Lumpur, di Shah Alam, PJ , Kelang dan Senawang. Baru boleh cover line. Lebih safe. Pukul borong. Pasti lokasi tak salah.Ingat tak... skrip filem pertama dulu pun macam ini juga. Mula-mula Sodo Mee Part One berlaku di kondo Bukit Bangsar. Tapi bila crew pergi check kondo ini pun belum siap dibuat. Macam mana nak menegang Sodo Mee kalau kondo belum siap. BerSodo Mee atas simen sakit.... beb. Tak percaya cuba try. Kah kah kah. Inilah filem kita berwajah kita.Woit! Brad Pittail. Takkan drama ke dua ini macam skrip pertama juga. Kan filem pertama dulu dah tak laku. Kalau nak tipu, tipulah. Menipu bukan satu kesalahan. Yang salah apabila orang tak percaya.Lakonan pegawai polis ini pun satu hal lagi. Dalam drama mesti ada aksi. Baru orang tengok syok. Lakonan polis ini sudah tidak masuk akal. Semua dilok polis sudah bikin kacau. Semua bikin susah. Mana dilok yang betul? Mula-mula cakap laporan penggambaran Sodo Mee ini dibuat di Balai Polis Jalan Travers kemudian laporan ini dibuat dekat pondok polis Hospital KL. Mana satu lokasi yang betul. Nak shoot pakai crane pun biarlah hati-hati. Dari Jalan Travers ke HKL berapa jauh daaa... Holywood pun tidak boleh buat satu long shot 10 kilometer jauhnya. Pasti kabur . Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.Dilok Bakreee Senin dalam 'act one' cukup tidak meyakinkan. Dialog ini tak masuk akal. Dalam filem Sivaji The Boss balai polis hanya dijaga oleh Tok Sarjan Saab. Dalam Sodo Mee Part Two yang menjaga Balai Travers ialah Tuan Bakree Senin sendiri. Apa hal gedebe ini menjaga balai. Tuan Bakree Senin ialah seorang OCPD. Tuan OCPD tidak jaga kaunter balai untuk ambil laporan. Dia tinggal dalam bilik khas. Ada kipas angin. Kerja OCPD Saab bukan ambil laporan atau buat teh. Ni yang buat kepala pening nonton filem Melayu.Semakin lama filem ini berjalan semakin kelam kabut jalan ceritanya. Laporan Sodo Mee ini diambil di mana ? Ulang shoot sekali lagi ke? Di Balai Travers atau di Pondok Polis HKL? Alaaa bradeer.... kalau Marlon Brando berlakon pun gua rasa payah dia nak deliver line macam ini. Aku rasa aktor Bombay Jalalaludeen Hasani boleh jadi OCPD macam dalam Sivaji. Tapi kalau abang dia berlakon gua rasa kentut pun tidak ada bau.Gua kurang faham kenapa si Mamat yang bernama Brad Pittail ini menjadi pengarah Sodo Mee Part Two? Si Mamat yang mengarah ini pun bukan hebat sangat otaknya. Semasa belajar dahulu dia slow sikit ( ini class mate dia seorang big lawyer yang joging hari-hari di Lake Garden bagi tahu). Dia slow kerana semasa kanak-kanak dia dihinggapi oleh wabak kurang cerdik. Mungkin badi wabak ini telah merosakkan daya fikir si Mamat ini. Itu fasal apabila dia bikin skrip drama, orang tidak percaya jalan ceritanya. Bila dia menjadi pengarah, cerita menjadi tidak lengkap dan berserabut.Betul-betul filem Melayu. Turun lokasi dulu kemudian baru buat skrip dan cari pelakon extra. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita. Hidup PDRM.. oops Hidup FINAS.Gua dengar skrip ini telah di ambil dari skrip lama filem Fitna Al- Sodom Al Drebarli. Skrip ini telah memenangi hadiah ke 3 peraduan skrip anjuran Matt Madey. Brad Pittail dipilih menjadi pengarah, bukan kerana dia bijak tetapi kerana dia bernasib baik. Ketika Matt Madey jadi PM ( production manager) dahulu, Madey cukup prihatin dan telah banyak membantu pelakon-pelakon Orang Kurang Berfikir (OKB) seperti pelakon Nazri, Fidah, Sami, AG dan GIP. Matt Madey cukup suka bergelojak dengan OKB. Matt Madey sebagai PM cukup cerdik mengemut bujet dan amat bijak dalam hal mengumpulkan pelakon-pelakon OKB ini. Kerana kurang berfikirlah maka Brad Pittail dapat menjadi pengarah. Kah kah kah.Tentang lakonan? Satu habuk pun penonton tidak akan percaya. Yang paling tidak meyakinkan ialah adegan lakonan hero filem ini dalam Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri. Kenapa pelakon utama filem ini digambari dengan seorang Mamat Hitam Lagi Pendek Lagi Muka Tak Laku. Mukanya Mamat Hitam ini macam muka Aman Belon.(Siapa Aman Belon? Gua penonton filem Melayu yang setia. Gua tahu siapa Aman Belon. Muka Mat Hitam itu macam muka Aman Belon. Kalau tidak caya sila tanya Bapak Saudara gua Lebai Google.)Apakah perlunya bergambar di dalam opis TPM? Siapa Mamat Hitam Pendek ini? Apa peranan dia dalam filem ini? Aku rasa Mamat Hitam ini adalah Mamat Bottom. Kalau muka gebu macam dia ini, kalau gua pengarah gua minta dia berlakon jadi hantu. Macam Aman Belon dalam cerita Pontianak. Mesti Rosmah.... oops Maria Menado menjadi takut.Pelakon utama filem Sodo Mee Part Two ini gua dengar ialah pendatang baru yang bernama Sinful Buka Harihari (tidak ada tali persaudaraan dengan si penyeludup beras di Perlis). Apa yang dia buka hari hari itu gua pun tidak tahu. Buka seluar ke atau buka punggung. Tingginya hampir enam kaki. Bila bergambar dengan Mamat Bottom itu gayanya betul-betul macam Wahid Satay berdiri disebelah Aman Belon. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah Bottom ....oops berwajah kita.Apa yang tidak masuk akal ialah apabila adegan Sinful hendak di liwat oleh seorang tua berumur 60 tahun , kenapa si Sinful TIDAK menendang atau menerajang si peliwat yang semakin tua ini. Kenapa tidak menggunakan ‘method acting’ atau ‘kung fu Bruce Lee Adegan ini skripnya tidak di tulis dengan betullaaa. Kalau ada pergaduhan lagi best. Lagi suspens. Lagi erotik. Inilah skrip filem Melayu kantoi all the time.Penonton berfikir.... mustahil hero kita yang baru berumur 23 tahun, tinggi 6 kaki tidak dapat menendang bakal peliwat yang sudah berumur 60 tahun. Kenapa tidak ada struggle dalam adegan ini. Patutnya ada dialog – ‘ ciss orang tua 60 tahun....jangan liwat bontot aku jika kamu tidak ada Ky Jelly...’ Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.Ingat tidak Maria Schneider yang nak di liwat oleh Brando dalam Last Tango In Paris pun ada tendang menendang. Ingat atau tidak adanya butter yang di gunakan oleh Brando. Semasa Bernardo Bertolucci membuat adegan ini berapa kilo butter terbarai. Ini baru skrip yang meyakinkan.Dalam Sodo Mee Part Two ini tidak ada adegan melawan. Ini amat-amat kurang meyakinkan. Hampir mustahil seorang anak hero yang lubang bontotnya hendak di jolok tidak dapat melawan. Kalau dia tidak jaga bontonya siapa yang akan menjaga. Apakah perlu JJ datang membantu? Lagi bahaya nanti, kena raba-raba sebelum dijolok.Orang ramai telah mula bercakap tentang skrip filem Sodo Mee Part 2 ini. Kegagalan skrip ini sudah nampak jelas. Kalau skrip ini gagal satu lagi krisis pasti akan timbul. Matt Madey tuan punya skrip original akan bertindak menyaman pengarah filem ini Saman akan diajukan kerana filem Part Two ini telah memalukan Matt Madey penulis asal skrip ini.Dari majalah Cine Revue du Fou, saya difahamkan mungkin skrip filem ini dapat di selamatkan dengan prop yang cukup menarik. Kali ini TILAM dan Bantal buruk yang ada dalam skrip asal tidak akan dipanggil untuk berlakon. Saya difahamkan tilam dan bantal akan diganti dengan minyak lintah dan kain gebar. Dan besar kemungkinan ada beberapa prop baru yang sedang direka oleh Brad Pittail. Prop-prop inilah nanti diharapkan akan meyakinkan penonton Malaysia.Saya juga mendengar beberapa ekor lintah hidup juga akan dibawa sebagai pembantu ‘special effect’ untuk mengeluarkan darah dalam babak pemeriksaan doktor. Darah perlu menitik keluar dari bontot Sinful Buka Harihari untuk menyeramkan penonton. Satu kamera angle yang unik sedang disusun di mana lintah tidak kelihatan tetapi darah menitis keluar dari bontot. Ini gua rasa akan menjadi satu adegan yang lebih hebat dari Last Tango.Kalau adegan darah meleleh keluar dari bontot Sinful Buka Harihari ini dapat dikamerkan maka gua yakin filem Sodo Mee Part Two ada peluang untuk di murtabakkan sebagai filem lawak Melayu Internasional untuk kurun ini. Gua rasa kalau scene ini berjaya gua yakin Sodo Mee Part Two boleh bertanding untuk mendapat piala Le Fou du Monde di Cuntt Filem Festival. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.
kata itu mesti dikotakan maa, tuan yang terutama.
jangan main2 cakap haa..
----- Original Message -----
From: Shahrunizan
To: uum_with_hons@yahoogroups.com
Cc: gang ; syed idrus syed husain ; sherry
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit - Lim Guan Eng
Bagaimana pulak dengan Lim Guan Eng..? mungkin dia juagak layak sekarang ?....dia ada sebut dulu dia sanggup berkhatan (potong itu bawah)..kalau bapak dia dah jalann..
kat mana ntah ada baca statement nih...kekekeke..
--- On Wed, 7/2/08, fairuz <fairuz@mahsa.edu.my> wrote:
From: fairuz <fairuz@mahsa.edu.my>Subject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - PenyakitTo: uum_with_hons@yahoogroups.comCc: "gang" <3d215@yahoogroups.com>, "syed idrus syed husain" <siriuz_lebaran@yahoo.com>, "sherry" <sharifahidayu2000@yahoo.com>Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 9:21 AM
Nik Aziz meamang bagus, aku suka dia, Chedet pun bagus, aku suka dia gak
tapi kedua2nya (dua2 ekor tu sebenarnya geng), tapi pendapat sayalah yg bebal ni tak boleh rasanya nak pimpin negara lagi, faktor kesihatan & fizikal
for time being, I'll vote for Najib to continue what his father had not.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ahmad Ilmi Jasman
To: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:06 AM
Subject: RE: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
Aku sekali lagi nak share cerita ex-UTK yg jadi bos security tempat keje lama aku. Sebagai UTK, mission dia, SHOOT TO KILL atau ESCORT VVIP (PM / TPM dll). So dalam keje Escort mengescort nih, banyak kali juga dia mengescort Anwar. Nak dijadikan cerita, bila malam hari dekat hotel (kerja outstation) Anwar akan kata kat bodyguard UTK ni, “Datuk-datuk tak payah ikut saya. Duduk di hotel, saya ada hal sebentar”. Bila? Malam hari. Apa dia buat? Ntah tapi keluar hotel dgn bukan kereta rasmi ikut pintu belakang menyorok-nyorok. Yg biasanya dia buat, dia kata biasalah…. So, aku kenal bebenar org yg cerita ni, so 85% aku percaya. So… kita pikirlah sendiri.
Macam yg korang kata, minta Allah tunjukkan siapa yg melakukan kesalahan, mendapat balasannya & kita mendapat petunjuk untuk pemimpin yg benar-benar peminpin…
Pilihan aku…..
Che Det (tapi bagilah kat org lain pulak, sebab banyak kelemahan Che Det kita dah nampak)
So yg paling layak… Nik Aziz… cuba bayangkan ulama’ menjadi PM. Insyallah kadar maksiat di KL akan turun mendadak atau tiada maksiat dikalangan org Islam….
AHMAD ILMI JASMAN
Human Capital Department
Credit Guarantee Corporation Malaysia Berhad
& Tel : 603-7806 2300 ext 228
* Fax : 603-7806 3306 / 7804 9802
8 E-Mail : ilmi@cgc.com. my
: Web site : www.iguarantee. com.my
-----Original Message-----From: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:uum_ with_hons@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of al hairilSent: Tuesday, 01 July, 2008 9:04 PMTo: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. comSubject: Re: Wayang Anwar Re: Sodo Mee - Penyakit
Entahlah... Jan... semoga Allah menunjukkan siapa dia sebenarnya.. . kalau dia betul baik. maka tunjukkan jalan yg baik utk dia, tapi kalau dia sebaliknya semoga dia bertaubat dan kembali ke pangkal jalan...--- On Tue, 7/1/08, jan ahmad
From: jan ahmad
bagi aku lak...tindakan anwar adalah strategi dia yang mungkin dianggap bijak..dia berjaya menarik perhatian dunia..kemudiannya mendapat jaminan akan keselamatan dia daripada kerajaan..dulu dia di tangkap kemudiannya di pukul oleh Ketua Polis Negara..jadi dia mempunyai sebab untuk berbuat demikian...kalau nak cakap Liberal Islamist ni..ada ka istilah macam tu..mcm fundamentalist islam..atau selainnya..sebab yang aku tahu hanya islam...tak ada hadharinya.. .
----- Original Message ----From: al hairil
Kalau kita baca karangan Hishamudin Rais tu mungkin kita percaya Anwar tak buat benda nie.. tapi biasanya kalau dia tak bersalah dia patutnya tak lari menyorok mcm skrg ni dan bagi alasan bukan2...
Masalahnya kita nampak Anwar ni skrg tak macam Anwar masa muda2 dulu, gaya cakapnya, visinya , "keadilannya " dah tak best mcm masa dia student dulu atau masa awal2 dlm bidang politik tu dulu..
Anwar skrg lebih adalah model Liberal Islamist oleh Amerika.. jadi hati kecil aku tetap berkata kalau takde angin masakan pokok boleh bergoyang...
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, Azlan Abd Malik
From: Azlan Abd Malik
Pokok pangkalnya jgn laaa meng idola kan pemimpin....
Saya dah tak nak meng idolakan Tun Mahathir lagi kerna tebukti dia ni banyak membawa kehancuran kpd umat Melayu kerna melayan nafsu2 si bodoh-bodoh Melayu-melayu yang dapat jawatan dalam UMNO
Ada jawatan ada fulus ...pirahhhh
Saya pun tak nak meng idola kan Anwar Ibrahim kerna kalau dia bersalah biarlaah dia dihukum oleh Allah...kita manusia tiada hak untuk menghakimi mutlak akhlak orang
Dulu dia pun sama terbabit dalam political game kerna nak melawan kroni2 mamak medey
Kita tak usah jd hipokrit sangat nak pemimpin yang betul2 mulia...kalau nak ekstrem tahap mulia ni haaaa kita pilih Nik Aziz...haa menngeletar org2 yang kaya sbb makan duit rakyat ni,.... sbb dah tak boleh pukul langsung duit rakyat,... baru padan muka...
kalau tak aku rasa kalau Anwar ni mungkin dia akan guna otak rasional lebih skit laaa
Kalau dia pun sama macam pak Lah jugak haaaa kan ramai org2 BN kita boley mintak tolong kasi jatuh balik.. Apa nak risau....... Polis ada (Ketua Polis kan dulu pernah kautem dgn org BN apa nak susah)
Apa? Anwar ejen kuasa Asing, kroni US...yea ke?
Bahya...mmg bahya tapi org yang dia lawan tu pun lagi teruk ...
Tak usah jd paku dulang paku serpih...
Tanya laa Daim Zainuddin... dia yg bagi bos dia George Soros kayee....sbb hilang pertaruhan duit pakai Bank Negara dulu..kakakaka
Lepas tu Soros ada cukup fund belasah laa kita negara Asia ciput ni bg kita miskin
Heyyy... Siasat betul2 dulu apsal Anwar Ibrahim dipecat..... ......
Yea ke ejen asing... kalau betul pengkhianat negara jatuhkanlaaa hukuman gantung atau firing squad barulahhh keadilan yang sebenarnya..
Takut pulakkk
--- On Tue, 1/7/08, jan ahmad
From: jan ahmad
sayang sokong encik tizry..saya pun bukan sokong anwar..tapi ini fitnah bab liwat kes besar ni
----- Original Message ----From: Saharudin Mohd Dan
..saya berpendapat anwar ibrahim bukanlah seorang sodom..
tetapi beliau adalah mangsa konspirasi politik negara..
inilah perkembangan tidak sihat yang telah mula menular ke dalam politik Malaysia, bila fitnah telah mula berkuasa, manakala kedaulatan dan kesucian undang-undang negara telah mula goyah dan tidak mempunyai integriti yang kukuh dan berwibawa.
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, bad lalih
From: bad lalih
Tuan-tuan semua, bagi saya kes saudara Anwar dituduh membontot orang bukanlah perkara pelik sekiranya ianya benar-benar berlaku.Berkemungki nan saudara Anwar kita mengidap penyakit yang kadang2 datang perasaan yg tidak normal utk membuat perkara terkutuk itu, penyakit ini bila datang menyerang, orang itu tidak akan dapat menahan, meskipun dia orang yg kuat beribadat.Umpama kita terasa lapar, makan aje la ubatnya. Atau byk kes lain seperti mat gian yg dtg gian sanggup buat apa saje utk menghilangkan gian, kes org2 kaya tapi sering mencuri benda2 kecil disupermarket, kes maknyah,pondan yg menjual tubuh,bukan salah mereka kerana mereka dilahirkan cacat nafsu..atau yg mcm lelaki macho tapi gay...mereka2 ini cacat nafsu dan berpenyakit yg hanya dapat diubati bila dapat 'menikmati' apa yg dihajati Walaupun solat dapat menghindari kerja2 terkutuk ini, namun penyakit ini bila datang menyerang insan2 ini gagal bertahan, namun jika mereka mengabaikan solat, maka lagi parah la penyakit mereka dan makin kerap membuat onar jika dibandingkan dgn mereka yg rajin bersolat. Saya sendiri pernah melihat seorang insan yg berserban dan solat malam, namun telah melakukan onar terhadap rakan saya di dalam masjid...masyaallah . Banyak juga kes ustaz maupun imam yg merogol anak gadis sedangkan mereka tidak mengabaikan solat...
Mungkin juga saudara Anwar pernah terlibat dimasa lampau,namun masih ada pihak yg mahu mengungkit utk tujuan politik. Jika benar, saya pun tak bersetuju waima perkara tersebut berlaku 20 30 thn yg lampau...saya tak rela bakal PM kita pernah menyodom org,nanti org2 asing berkata"PM M'sia mat bontot". Walaupun tidak benar,saya masih tidak bersetuju beliau menjadi PM kerana segelintir org masih berkata dan menuduh beliau mat sodom. Ramai lagi yg layak jadi PM.
Jalan penyelesaian bagi kes ini, saya syorkan Saudara Anwar bersumpah dgn menjunjung Al-Quran dan dibuat secara live di TV utk menafikan perkara ini dengan menyatakan yg beliau tidak pernah melakukan seks diluar tabii sepanjang hayatnya...then baru saya sokong dia jadi PM.Wallahualam. ...--- On Tue, 7/1/08, fairuz
From: fairuz
tapi bila tengok anwar punya melatah kadang2 kelakar gak, semua orang dia mau kasi babit
moral of the story
Bila u fitnah orang dgn bukti yg dangkal, tapi orang tu selamba ajer, rileks tak melatah,
tapi Bila u pulak kena fitnah sikit je, budak 23tahun, punya kelamkabut bagai nak rak, kalau buleh satu dunia nak kena tahu.
Kita ambil lah pelajaran dari kes anwar ni. Allah SWT memberi tanda2 kekuasaannya dan membalasnya dengan kehendakNya untuk kita rakyat malaysia tengok untuk difikirkan.
berani kerana benar
takut kerana salah
pulang paku buah keras
Stone
----- Original Message -----
From: Safiallah Zakaria
To: uum_with_hons@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: FW: Sodo Mee - Part 2
Sumpah lawak...Safiallah Zakaria Mobile:- +6012-283 1494 Alt. Email:- safi_zakaria@ yahoo.com
Betul-betul filem Melayu. Turun lokasi dulu kemudian baru buat skrip dan cari pelakon extra. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita. Hidup PDRM... oops Hidup FINAS. DARI JELEBU Alamak gua dengar filem Sodo Me karya Brad Pittail akan di buat lagi. Sodo Mee Part 2 ini akan dibuat dengan lebih gempaq. Gua dengar dengan sahih si pengarah Brad Pittail sudah mulakan penggambaran. Iklan-iklan telah bocor di akhbar-akhbar. Pelakon utama telah ditemui.Dengar-dengar nya filem Part Two ini amat gah TETAPI lokasinya masih belum di tentukan. Inilah standard filem Melayu. Leceh. Kata nak buat filem gempaq. Lokasi pun belum jumpa. Bila di tanya Brad Pittail di mana lokasi tempat Sodo Mee terjadi, dia berkata: lokasinya berlaku di dalam kondo di Jalan Pantai, di kondo di Jalan Bangsar dan di kondo Damansara dan terus ke kondo Segambut. In best punya Sodo Mee beb. Makan tak habis.Woit! Ada berapa ribu kondo di sana? Yang mana satu kondo yang betul. Ini nampaknya bukan filem Sodo Mee Part Two. Kalau kondo panjang-panjang dan nama kondo pun tidak jelas ini samalah seperti kempen undilah Shahrizat Gadis Pilihanku. Biar betul Kalau macam itu baik cakap Sodo Mee ini berlaku di semua kondo-kondo di Kuala Lumpur, di Shah Alam, PJ , Kelang dan Senawang. Baru boleh cover line. Lebih safe. Pukul borong. Pasti lokasi tak salah.Ingat tak... skrip filem pertama dulu pun macam ini juga. Mula-mula Sodo Mee Part One berlaku di kondo Bukit Bangsar. Tapi bila crew pergi check kondo ini pun belum siap dibuat. Macam mana nak menegang Sodo Mee kalau kondo belum siap. BerSodo Mee atas simen sakit.... beb. Tak percaya cuba try. Kah kah kah. Inilah filem kita berwajah kita.Woit! Brad Pittail. Takkan drama ke dua ini macam skrip pertama juga. Kan filem pertama dulu dah tak laku. Kalau nak tipu, tipulah. Menipu bukan satu kesalahan. Yang salah apabila orang tak percaya.Lakonan pegawai polis ini pun satu hal lagi. Dalam drama mesti ada aksi. Baru orang tengok syok. Lakonan polis ini sudah tidak masuk akal. Semua dilok polis sudah bikin kacau. Semua bikin susah. Mana dilok yang betul? Mula-mula cakap laporan penggambaran Sodo Mee ini dibuat di Balai Polis Jalan Travers kemudian laporan ini dibuat dekat pondok polis Hospital KL. Mana satu lokasi yang betul. Nak shoot pakai crane pun biarlah hati-hati. Dari Jalan Travers ke HKL berapa jauh daaa... Holywood pun tidak boleh buat satu long shot 10 kilometer jauhnya. Pasti kabur . Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.Dilok Bakreee Senin dalam 'act one' cukup tidak meyakinkan. Dialog ini tak masuk akal. Dalam filem Sivaji The Boss balai polis hanya dijaga oleh Tok Sarjan Saab. Dalam Sodo Mee Part Two yang menjaga Balai Travers ialah Tuan Bakree Senin sendiri. Apa hal gedebe ini menjaga balai. Tuan Bakree Senin ialah seorang OCPD. Tuan OCPD tidak jaga kaunter balai untuk ambil laporan. Dia tinggal dalam bilik khas. Ada kipas angin. Kerja OCPD Saab bukan ambil laporan atau buat teh. Ni yang buat kepala pening nonton filem Melayu.Semakin lama filem ini berjalan semakin kelam kabut jalan ceritanya. Laporan Sodo Mee ini diambil di mana ? Ulang shoot sekali lagi ke? Di Balai Travers atau di Pondok Polis HKL? Alaaa bradeer.... kalau Marlon Brando berlakon pun gua rasa payah dia nak deliver line macam ini. Aku rasa aktor Bombay Jalalaludeen Hasani boleh jadi OCPD macam dalam Sivaji. Tapi kalau abang dia berlakon gua rasa kentut pun tidak ada bau.Gua kurang faham kenapa si Mamat yang bernama Brad Pittail ini menjadi pengarah Sodo Mee Part Two? Si Mamat yang mengarah ini pun bukan hebat sangat otaknya. Semasa belajar dahulu dia slow sikit ( ini class mate dia seorang big lawyer yang joging hari-hari di Lake Garden bagi tahu). Dia slow kerana semasa kanak-kanak dia dihinggapi oleh wabak kurang cerdik. Mungkin badi wabak ini telah merosakkan daya fikir si Mamat ini. Itu fasal apabila dia bikin skrip drama, orang tidak percaya jalan ceritanya. Bila dia menjadi pengarah, cerita menjadi tidak lengkap dan berserabut.Betul-betul filem Melayu. Turun lokasi dulu kemudian baru buat skrip dan cari pelakon extra. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita. Hidup PDRM.. oops Hidup FINAS.Gua dengar skrip ini telah di ambil dari skrip lama filem Fitna Al- Sodom Al Drebarli. Skrip ini telah memenangi hadiah ke 3 peraduan skrip anjuran Matt Madey. Brad Pittail dipilih menjadi pengarah, bukan kerana dia bijak tetapi kerana dia bernasib baik. Ketika Matt Madey jadi PM ( production manager) dahulu, Madey cukup prihatin dan telah banyak membantu pelakon-pelakon Orang Kurang Berfikir (OKB) seperti pelakon Nazri, Fidah, Sami, AG dan GIP. Matt Madey cukup suka bergelojak dengan OKB. Matt Madey sebagai PM cukup cerdik mengemut bujet dan amat bijak dalam hal mengumpulkan pelakon-pelakon OKB ini. Kerana kurang berfikirlah maka Brad Pittail dapat menjadi pengarah. Kah kah kah.Tentang lakonan? Satu habuk pun penonton tidak akan percaya. Yang paling tidak meyakinkan ialah adegan lakonan hero filem ini dalam Pejabat Timbalan Perdana Menteri. Kenapa pelakon utama filem ini digambari dengan seorang Mamat Hitam Lagi Pendek Lagi Muka Tak Laku. Mukanya Mamat Hitam ini macam muka Aman Belon.(Siapa Aman Belon? Gua penonton filem Melayu yang setia. Gua tahu siapa Aman Belon. Muka Mat Hitam itu macam muka Aman Belon. Kalau tidak caya sila tanya Bapak Saudara gua Lebai Google.)Apakah perlunya bergambar di dalam opis TPM? Siapa Mamat Hitam Pendek ini? Apa peranan dia dalam filem ini? Aku rasa Mamat Hitam ini adalah Mamat Bottom. Kalau muka gebu macam dia ini, kalau gua pengarah gua minta dia berlakon jadi hantu. Macam Aman Belon dalam cerita Pontianak. Mesti Rosmah.... oops Maria Menado menjadi takut.Pelakon utama filem Sodo Mee Part Two ini gua dengar ialah pendatang baru yang bernama Sinful Buka Harihari (tidak ada tali persaudaraan dengan si penyeludup beras di Perlis). Apa yang dia buka hari hari itu gua pun tidak tahu. Buka seluar ke atau buka punggung. Tingginya hampir enam kaki. Bila bergambar dengan Mamat Bottom itu gayanya betul-betul macam Wahid Satay berdiri disebelah Aman Belon. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah Bottom ....oops berwajah kita.Apa yang tidak masuk akal ialah apabila adegan Sinful hendak di liwat oleh seorang tua berumur 60 tahun , kenapa si Sinful TIDAK menendang atau menerajang si peliwat yang semakin tua ini. Kenapa tidak menggunakan ‘method acting’ atau ‘kung fu Bruce Lee Adegan ini skripnya tidak di tulis dengan betullaaa. Kalau ada pergaduhan lagi best. Lagi suspens. Lagi erotik. Inilah skrip filem Melayu kantoi all the time.Penonton berfikir.... mustahil hero kita yang baru berumur 23 tahun, tinggi 6 kaki tidak dapat menendang bakal peliwat yang sudah berumur 60 tahun. Kenapa tidak ada struggle dalam adegan ini. Patutnya ada dialog – ‘ ciss orang tua 60 tahun....jangan liwat bontot aku jika kamu tidak ada Ky Jelly...’ Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.Ingat tidak Maria Schneider yang nak di liwat oleh Brando dalam Last Tango In Paris pun ada tendang menendang. Ingat atau tidak adanya butter yang di gunakan oleh Brando. Semasa Bernardo Bertolucci membuat adegan ini berapa kilo butter terbarai. Ini baru skrip yang meyakinkan.Dalam Sodo Mee Part Two ini tidak ada adegan melawan. Ini amat-amat kurang meyakinkan. Hampir mustahil seorang anak hero yang lubang bontotnya hendak di jolok tidak dapat melawan. Kalau dia tidak jaga bontonya siapa yang akan menjaga. Apakah perlu JJ datang membantu? Lagi bahaya nanti, kena raba-raba sebelum dijolok.Orang ramai telah mula bercakap tentang skrip filem Sodo Mee Part 2 ini. Kegagalan skrip ini sudah nampak jelas. Kalau skrip ini gagal satu lagi krisis pasti akan timbul. Matt Madey tuan punya skrip original akan bertindak menyaman pengarah filem ini Saman akan diajukan kerana filem Part Two ini telah memalukan Matt Madey penulis asal skrip ini.Dari majalah Cine Revue du Fou, saya difahamkan mungkin skrip filem ini dapat di selamatkan dengan prop yang cukup menarik. Kali ini TILAM dan Bantal buruk yang ada dalam skrip asal tidak akan dipanggil untuk berlakon. Saya difahamkan tilam dan bantal akan diganti dengan minyak lintah dan kain gebar. Dan besar kemungkinan ada beberapa prop baru yang sedang direka oleh Brad Pittail. Prop-prop inilah nanti diharapkan akan meyakinkan penonton Malaysia.Saya juga mendengar beberapa ekor lintah hidup juga akan dibawa sebagai pembantu ‘special effect’ untuk mengeluarkan darah dalam babak pemeriksaan doktor. Darah perlu menitik keluar dari bontot Sinful Buka Harihari untuk menyeramkan penonton. Satu kamera angle yang unik sedang disusun di mana lintah tidak kelihatan tetapi darah menitis keluar dari bontot. Ini gua rasa akan menjadi satu adegan yang lebih hebat dari Last Tango.Kalau adegan darah meleleh keluar dari bontot Sinful Buka Harihari ini dapat dikamerkan maka gua yakin filem Sodo Mee Part Two ada peluang untuk di murtabakkan sebagai filem lawak Melayu Internasional untuk kurun ini. Gua rasa kalau scene ini berjaya gua yakin Sodo Mee Part Two boleh bertanding untuk mendapat piala Le Fou du Monde di Cuntt Filem Festival. Kah kah kah. Filem kita berwajah kita.
Anwar Ibrahim Gimmick
Tapi bila tengok Anwar Ibrahim punya melatah kadang2 kelakar gak, semua orang dia mau kasi babit
Moral of the story
Bila u fitnah orang dgn bukti yg dangkal, tapi orang tu selamba ajer, rileks tak melatah,
tapi Bila u pulak kena fitnah sikit je, budak 23tahun, punya kelamkabut bagai nak rak, kalau buleh satu dunia nak kena tahu.
Kita ambil lah pelajaran dari kes anwar ni. Allah SWT memberi tanda2 kekuasaannya dan membalasnya dengan kehendakNya untuk kita rakyat malaysia tengok untuk difikirkan.
Berani kerana Benar
Takut kerana Salah
Pulang Paku Buah Keras
Semuanya kita boleh simpulkan dalam bahasa inggeris
"Do Unto Others, As They Done To You
fight fire with fire
ending is near
fight fire with fire
bursting is fear
we all shall die" (credit to Metallica)
Stone
Moral of the story
Bila u fitnah orang dgn bukti yg dangkal, tapi orang tu selamba ajer, rileks tak melatah,
tapi Bila u pulak kena fitnah sikit je, budak 23tahun, punya kelamkabut bagai nak rak, kalau buleh satu dunia nak kena tahu.
Kita ambil lah pelajaran dari kes anwar ni. Allah SWT memberi tanda2 kekuasaannya dan membalasnya dengan kehendakNya untuk kita rakyat malaysia tengok untuk difikirkan.
Berani kerana Benar
Takut kerana Salah
Pulang Paku Buah Keras
Semuanya kita boleh simpulkan dalam bahasa inggeris
"Do Unto Others, As They Done To You
fight fire with fire
ending is near
fight fire with fire
bursting is fear
we all shall die" (credit to Metallica)
Stone
Friday, June 27, 2008
Gospel of Barnabas - The least modified bible
The Gospel of Barnabas claims that Jesus predicted the advent of Muhammad, thus conforming with the Qur'an which mentions:
"And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: O Children of Israel! I am the apostle of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of an Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad. But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, this is evident sorcery!" (Sura 61:6)
(Ahmad is another name of Muhammad.) A Muslim scholarly tradition links this Qur'anic passage to the New Testament references to the Paraclete (John 14:16, 14:26, 15:26, 16:7). The Greek word "paraclete" can be translated "Counsellor"; and in the Christian tradition, is said to refer to the Holy Spirit. Some Muslim scholars have noted the similarity to the Greek "periklutos" which can be translated as "admirable one"; or in Arabic, "Ahmad".
The name of "Muhammad" is frequently mentioned verbatim in the Gospel of Barnabas, as in the following quote:
"Jesus answered: `The name of the Messiah is admirable, for God himself gave him the name when he had created his soul, and placed it in a celestial splendour. God said: "Wait Mohammed; for thy sake I will to create paradise, the world, and a great multitude of creatures, whereof I make thee a present, insomuch that whoso bless thee shall be blessed, and whoso shall curse thee shall be accursed. When I shall send thee into the world I shall send thee as my messenger of salvation, and thy word shall be true, insomuch that heaven and earth shall fail, but thy faith shall never fail." Mohammed is his blessed name.' Then the crowd lifted up their voices, saying: `O God, send us thy messenger: O Admirable One, come quickly for the salvation of the world!'" Barnabas 97:9-10. The Italian manuscript replaces "Admirable One" with "Muhammad" [4].
However, while there are many passages where the Gospel of Barnabas sets out alternative readings to parallel pericopes found in the canonical gospels, none of the references to Muhammad by name occurs in such a synoptic passage; and in particular, none of the "Muhammad" references in Barnabas corresponds to a "Paraclete" reference in canonical John. There is only one instance where the Gospel of Barnabas might be understood as "correcting" a known canonical pericope, so as to record a prophecy by Jesus of the (unnamed) Messenger of God:
Then Jesus said: "I am a voice that cries through all Judea, and cries: "Prepare you the way for the messenger of the Lord," even as it is written in Esaias." They said: "If you be not the Messiah nor Elijah, or any prophet, wherefore do you preach new doctrine, and make yourself of more account than the Messiah?" Jesus answered: "The miracles which God works by my hands show that I speak that which God wills; nor indeed do I make myself to be accounted as him of whom you speak. For I am not worthy to unloose the ties of the hosen or the ratchets of the shoes of the Messenger of God whom you call "Messiah," who was made before me, and shall come after me, and shall bring the words of truth, so that his faith shall have no end." (Chapter 43):
This passage corresponds closely with the canonical John 1:19-30, except that in that passage, the words are spoken by John the Baptist (in the Qur'an; Yahya ibn Zakariya) and refer to Jesus.
[edit] Muhammad as the Messiah
According to one version of the Gospel of Barnabas:
'Then said the priest: "How shall the Messiah be called?" {Jesus answered} "Muhammed is his blessed name" ' (ch. 97).
and
Jesus confessed, and said the truth: "I am not the Messiah." (ch. 42:2)
As mentioned above, these pronouncements appear to contradict Islamic belief. However, the well-known Muslim debater Ahmed Deedat argues that, since "Messiah" merely means "anointed", it can be attributed to any prophet, and Jesus would have meant Muhammad was anointed by God.
[edit] Ishmaelite Messiah
According to one version of the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus denied being the Messiah, claiming rather that the Messiah would be Ishmaelite (ie Arab):
"Whereupon Jesus said: 'Ye deceive yourselves; for David in spirit calleth him lord, saying thus: "God said to my lord, sit thou on my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool. God shall send forth thy rod which shall have lordship in the midst of thine enemies." If the messenger of God whom ye call Messiah were son of David, how should David call him lord? Believe me, for verily I say to you, that the promise was made in Ishmael, not in Isaac.'" (Barnabas 43:10)
Hajj Sayed (Senior Member in CIMS), in his new book in Egypt, compares this to the following statement from the canonical Bible:
"What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" "The son of David," they replied. He said to them, "How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says, 'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet.' If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son?" Matthew 22:42-46
According to the canonical Gospels, Jesus was the "son" (descendant) of David; thus, Hajj Sayed argues that this statement confirms the Gospel of Barnabas' point.
The idea of the Messiah as an Arab is also found in another chapter of Gospel of Barnabas:
"If I work iniquity, reprove me, and God will love you, because you shall be doing his will, but if none can reprove me of sin it is a sign that you are not sons of Abraham as you call yourselves, nor are you incorporate with that head wherein Abraham was incorporate. As God lives, so greatly did Abraham love God, that he not only brake in pieces the false idols and forsook his father and mother, but was willing to slay his own son in obedience to God.
The high priest answered: "This I ask of you, and I do not seek to slay you, wherefore tell us: Who was this son of Abraham?" Jesus answered: "The zeal of your honour, O God, inflames me, and I cannot hold my peace. Truly I say, the son of Abraham was Ishmael, from whom must be descended the Messiah promised to Abraham, that in him should all the tribes of the earth be blessed." Then was the high priest wroth, hearing this, and cried out: "Let us stone this impious fellow, for he is an Ishmaelite, and has spoken blasphemy against Moses and against the Law of God." (Barnabas 208:1-2)
Here, one version of the Gospel of Barnabas also quotes Jesus as saying that the sacrificed son of Abraham was Ishmael not Isaac, conforming to Islamic belief but disagreeing with Jewish and Christian belief. A connection might also be drawn between the last paragraph's statement that "in him should all the tribes of the earth be blessed", and the meaning of the name "Muhammad", the "Praised (or Blessed) One". (Cf.Life of Prophet Muhammad).
[edit] Jesus not God or Son of God
According to the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus foresaw and rejected his own deification:
And having said this, Jesus smote his face with both his hands, and then smote the ground with his head. And having raised his head, he said: "Cursed be every one who shall insert into my sayings that I am the son of God" (53:6)
And having said this Jesus went out of the Temple. And the common people magnified him, for they brought all the sick folk whom they could gather together, and Jesus having made prayer gave to all their health: whereupon on that day in Jerusalem the Roman soldiery, by the working of Satan, began to stir up the common people, saying that Jesus was the God of Israel, who was come to visit his people." (69:6)
Jesus answered: "And you; what say you that I am?" Peter answered: "You are Christ, son of God". Then was Jesus angry, and with anger rebuked him, saying: "Begone and depart from me, because you are the devil and seek to cause me offences" (70:1)
Jesus said again: "I confess before heaven, and call to witness everything that dwells upon the earth, that I am a stranger to all that men have said of me, to wit, that I am more than man. For I am a man, born of a woman, subject to the judgment of God; that live here like as other men, subject to the common miseries" (94:1)
Then answered the priest, with the governor and the king, saying: "Distress not yourself, O Jesus, holy one of God, because in our time shall not this sedition be any more, seeing that we will write to the sacred Roman senate in such wise that by imperial decree none shall any more call you God or son of God." Then Jesus said: "With your words I am not consoled, because where you hope for light darkness shall come; but my consolation is in the coming of the Messenger, who shall destroy every false opinion of me, and his faith shall spread and shall take hold of the whole world, for so has God promised to Abraham our father." (97:1)
This conforms entirely with Muslim belief, according to which Jesus is a human and a prophet. According to some ahadith, he will come back to earth in the future and declare to the world that he is "a Servant of God". According to Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki in his audio lessons Lives of the Prophets, the first thing that prophet Jesus said when he was in the cradle "I am a servant of God", and the first thing that Jesus will say when he will come back to earth will be the same "I am a servant of God". According to the Qur'an:
At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: "O Mary! truly an amazing thing hast thou brought! O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!" But she pointed to the babe. They said: "How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle? He said: "I am indeed a servant of Allah (God). He hath given me revelation and made me a prophet; And He hath made me blessed wheresoever I be, and hath enjoined on me Prayer and Charity as long as I live; (He) hath made me kind to my mother, and not overbearing or miserable; So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)"! Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they dispute. It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah (God) that He beget a son. Glory be to Him! when He determines a matter, He only says to it, "Be", and it is. (Mary:27-35)
[edit] Paul and Barnabas
Hajj Sayed argues that Galatians's description of the dispute between Paul and Barnabas supports the idea that the Gospel of Barnabas existed at the time of Paul. Blackhirst has suggested, by contrast, that Galatian's account of this argument could be the reason the gospel's writer attributed it to Barnabas.[5] Paul writes in (Galatians Chapter 2):
"When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. Before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray." (Galatians 2:11-14)
Paul was attacking Peter and Barnabas for "trying to satisfy the Jews" by sticking to their laws, such as circumcision. This shows that, at that point, Barnabas was following Peter and disagreeing with Paul. Some feel it also suggests that the inhabitants of Galatia at his time were using a gospel or gospels disagreeing with Paul's beliefs, which Gospel of Barnabas could be one of them (although the Gospel of Peter would seem a more natural candidate, as in the light of the second letter.) To Galatian's account we may compare the Introductory Chapter of Gospel of Barnabas, where we read:
"Dearly beloved the great and wonderful God hath during these past days visited us by his prophet Jesus Christ in great mercy of teaching and miracles, by reason whereof many, being deceived of Satan, under presence of piety, are preaching most impious doctrine, calling Jesus son of God, repudiating the circumcision ordained of God for ever, and permitting every unclean meat: among whom also Paul hath been deceived, whereof I speak not without grief; for which cause I am writing that truth which I have seen and heard, in the intercourse that I have had with Jesus, in order that ye may be saved, and not be deceived of Satan and perish in the judgment of God. Therefore beware of every one that preacheth unto you new doctrine contrary to that which I write, that ye may be saved eternally." (Introduction To Gospel of Barnabas)
In this context, supporters also note that Peter was from the original 12 disciples of Jesus, and Barnabas was one of the early disciples of Jesus, while Paul, a Roman, hadn't lived with Jesus, and had been accustomed to persecute his followers before his conversion.
Acts 9:26-27: "And when Saul [Paul] was come to Jerusalem he assayed to join himself to the disciples, but they were all afraid of him and believed not that he was a disciple. But Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles"
From the previous passages, we can also infer that in the beginning, Paul and Barnabas were getting along with each other; however, at the end, they started to depart in their beliefs.
In conclusion, some Muslim scholars believe that those differences between the Gospel of Barnabas and the belief of Paul might be the reason that the Gospel of Barnabas and other gospels were not added to the New Testament.
[edit] Other non-canonical differences
According to the following quote, Jesus talked to Barnabas and gave him a "secret":
Jesus, weeping, said: "O Barnabas, it is necessary that I should reveal to you great secrets, which, after that I shall be departed from the world, you shall reveal to it." Then answered he that writes, weeping, and said: "Suffer me to weep, O master, and other men also, for that we are sinners. And you, that are a holy one and prophet of God, it is not fitting for you to weep so much."
Jesus answered: "Believe me, Barnabas that I cannot weep as much as I ought. For if men had not called me God, I should have seen God here as he will be seen in paradise, and should have been safe not to fear the day of judgment. But God knows that I am innocent, because never have I harboured thought to be held more than a poor slave. No, I tell you that if I had not been called God I should have been carried into paradise when I shall depart from the world, whereas now I shall not go thither until the judgment. Now you see if I have cause to weep.
Know, O Barnabas, that for this I must have great persecution, and shall be sold by one of my disciples for thirty pieces of money. Whereupon I am sure that he who shall sell me shall be slain in my name, for that God shall take me up from the earth, and shall change the appearance of the traitor so that every one shall believe him to be me; nevertheless, when he dies an evil death, I shall abide in that dishonour for a long time in the world. But when Muhammad shall come, the sacred Messenger of God, that infamy shall be taken away. And this shall God do because I have confessed the truth of the Messiah who shall give me this reward, that I shall be known to be alive and to be a stranger to that death of infamy."
Also according to GoB, Jesus charged Barnabas to write the gospel:
Jesus turned himself to him who writes, and said: "Barnabas, see that by all means you write my gospel concerning all that has happened through my dwelling in the world. And write in a similar manner that which has befallen Judas, in order that the faithful may be undeceived, and every one may believe the truth."
"And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: O Children of Israel! I am the apostle of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of an Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad. But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, this is evident sorcery!" (Sura 61:6)
(Ahmad is another name of Muhammad.) A Muslim scholarly tradition links this Qur'anic passage to the New Testament references to the Paraclete (John 14:16, 14:26, 15:26, 16:7). The Greek word "paraclete" can be translated "Counsellor"; and in the Christian tradition, is said to refer to the Holy Spirit. Some Muslim scholars have noted the similarity to the Greek "periklutos" which can be translated as "admirable one"; or in Arabic, "Ahmad".
The name of "Muhammad" is frequently mentioned verbatim in the Gospel of Barnabas, as in the following quote:
"Jesus answered: `The name of the Messiah is admirable, for God himself gave him the name when he had created his soul, and placed it in a celestial splendour. God said: "Wait Mohammed; for thy sake I will to create paradise, the world, and a great multitude of creatures, whereof I make thee a present, insomuch that whoso bless thee shall be blessed, and whoso shall curse thee shall be accursed. When I shall send thee into the world I shall send thee as my messenger of salvation, and thy word shall be true, insomuch that heaven and earth shall fail, but thy faith shall never fail." Mohammed is his blessed name.' Then the crowd lifted up their voices, saying: `O God, send us thy messenger: O Admirable One, come quickly for the salvation of the world!'" Barnabas 97:9-10. The Italian manuscript replaces "Admirable One" with "Muhammad" [4].
However, while there are many passages where the Gospel of Barnabas sets out alternative readings to parallel pericopes found in the canonical gospels, none of the references to Muhammad by name occurs in such a synoptic passage; and in particular, none of the "Muhammad" references in Barnabas corresponds to a "Paraclete" reference in canonical John. There is only one instance where the Gospel of Barnabas might be understood as "correcting" a known canonical pericope, so as to record a prophecy by Jesus of the (unnamed) Messenger of God:
Then Jesus said: "I am a voice that cries through all Judea, and cries: "Prepare you the way for the messenger of the Lord," even as it is written in Esaias." They said: "If you be not the Messiah nor Elijah, or any prophet, wherefore do you preach new doctrine, and make yourself of more account than the Messiah?" Jesus answered: "The miracles which God works by my hands show that I speak that which God wills; nor indeed do I make myself to be accounted as him of whom you speak. For I am not worthy to unloose the ties of the hosen or the ratchets of the shoes of the Messenger of God whom you call "Messiah," who was made before me, and shall come after me, and shall bring the words of truth, so that his faith shall have no end." (Chapter 43):
This passage corresponds closely with the canonical John 1:19-30, except that in that passage, the words are spoken by John the Baptist (in the Qur'an; Yahya ibn Zakariya) and refer to Jesus.
[edit] Muhammad as the Messiah
According to one version of the Gospel of Barnabas:
'Then said the priest: "How shall the Messiah be called?" {Jesus answered} "Muhammed is his blessed name" ' (ch. 97).
and
Jesus confessed, and said the truth: "I am not the Messiah." (ch. 42:2)
As mentioned above, these pronouncements appear to contradict Islamic belief. However, the well-known Muslim debater Ahmed Deedat argues that, since "Messiah" merely means "anointed", it can be attributed to any prophet, and Jesus would have meant Muhammad was anointed by God.
[edit] Ishmaelite Messiah
According to one version of the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus denied being the Messiah, claiming rather that the Messiah would be Ishmaelite (ie Arab):
"Whereupon Jesus said: 'Ye deceive yourselves; for David in spirit calleth him lord, saying thus: "God said to my lord, sit thou on my right hand until I make thine enemies thy footstool. God shall send forth thy rod which shall have lordship in the midst of thine enemies." If the messenger of God whom ye call Messiah were son of David, how should David call him lord? Believe me, for verily I say to you, that the promise was made in Ishmael, not in Isaac.'" (Barnabas 43:10)
Hajj Sayed (Senior Member in CIMS), in his new book in Egypt, compares this to the following statement from the canonical Bible:
"What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?" "The son of David," they replied. He said to them, "How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says, 'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet.' If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son?" Matthew 22:42-46
According to the canonical Gospels, Jesus was the "son" (descendant) of David; thus, Hajj Sayed argues that this statement confirms the Gospel of Barnabas' point.
The idea of the Messiah as an Arab is also found in another chapter of Gospel of Barnabas:
"If I work iniquity, reprove me, and God will love you, because you shall be doing his will, but if none can reprove me of sin it is a sign that you are not sons of Abraham as you call yourselves, nor are you incorporate with that head wherein Abraham was incorporate. As God lives, so greatly did Abraham love God, that he not only brake in pieces the false idols and forsook his father and mother, but was willing to slay his own son in obedience to God.
The high priest answered: "This I ask of you, and I do not seek to slay you, wherefore tell us: Who was this son of Abraham?" Jesus answered: "The zeal of your honour, O God, inflames me, and I cannot hold my peace. Truly I say, the son of Abraham was Ishmael, from whom must be descended the Messiah promised to Abraham, that in him should all the tribes of the earth be blessed." Then was the high priest wroth, hearing this, and cried out: "Let us stone this impious fellow, for he is an Ishmaelite, and has spoken blasphemy against Moses and against the Law of God." (Barnabas 208:1-2)
Here, one version of the Gospel of Barnabas also quotes Jesus as saying that the sacrificed son of Abraham was Ishmael not Isaac, conforming to Islamic belief but disagreeing with Jewish and Christian belief. A connection might also be drawn between the last paragraph's statement that "in him should all the tribes of the earth be blessed", and the meaning of the name "Muhammad", the "Praised (or Blessed) One". (Cf.Life of Prophet Muhammad).
[edit] Jesus not God or Son of God
According to the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus foresaw and rejected his own deification:
And having said this, Jesus smote his face with both his hands, and then smote the ground with his head. And having raised his head, he said: "Cursed be every one who shall insert into my sayings that I am the son of God" (53:6)
And having said this Jesus went out of the Temple. And the common people magnified him, for they brought all the sick folk whom they could gather together, and Jesus having made prayer gave to all their health: whereupon on that day in Jerusalem the Roman soldiery, by the working of Satan, began to stir up the common people, saying that Jesus was the God of Israel, who was come to visit his people." (69:6)
Jesus answered: "And you; what say you that I am?" Peter answered: "You are Christ, son of God". Then was Jesus angry, and with anger rebuked him, saying: "Begone and depart from me, because you are the devil and seek to cause me offences" (70:1)
Jesus said again: "I confess before heaven, and call to witness everything that dwells upon the earth, that I am a stranger to all that men have said of me, to wit, that I am more than man. For I am a man, born of a woman, subject to the judgment of God; that live here like as other men, subject to the common miseries" (94:1)
Then answered the priest, with the governor and the king, saying: "Distress not yourself, O Jesus, holy one of God, because in our time shall not this sedition be any more, seeing that we will write to the sacred Roman senate in such wise that by imperial decree none shall any more call you God or son of God." Then Jesus said: "With your words I am not consoled, because where you hope for light darkness shall come; but my consolation is in the coming of the Messenger, who shall destroy every false opinion of me, and his faith shall spread and shall take hold of the whole world, for so has God promised to Abraham our father." (97:1)
This conforms entirely with Muslim belief, according to which Jesus is a human and a prophet. According to some ahadith, he will come back to earth in the future and declare to the world that he is "a Servant of God". According to Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki in his audio lessons Lives of the Prophets, the first thing that prophet Jesus said when he was in the cradle "I am a servant of God", and the first thing that Jesus will say when he will come back to earth will be the same "I am a servant of God". According to the Qur'an:
At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: "O Mary! truly an amazing thing hast thou brought! O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!" But she pointed to the babe. They said: "How can we talk to one who is a child in the cradle? He said: "I am indeed a servant of Allah (God). He hath given me revelation and made me a prophet; And He hath made me blessed wheresoever I be, and hath enjoined on me Prayer and Charity as long as I live; (He) hath made me kind to my mother, and not overbearing or miserable; So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)"! Such (was) Jesus the son of Mary: (it is) a statement of truth, about which they dispute. It is not befitting to (the majesty of) Allah (God) that He beget a son. Glory be to Him! when He determines a matter, He only says to it, "Be", and it is. (Mary:27-35)
[edit] Paul and Barnabas
Hajj Sayed argues that Galatians's description of the dispute between Paul and Barnabas supports the idea that the Gospel of Barnabas existed at the time of Paul. Blackhirst has suggested, by contrast, that Galatian's account of this argument could be the reason the gospel's writer attributed it to Barnabas.[5] Paul writes in (Galatians Chapter 2):
"When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong. Before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray." (Galatians 2:11-14)
Paul was attacking Peter and Barnabas for "trying to satisfy the Jews" by sticking to their laws, such as circumcision. This shows that, at that point, Barnabas was following Peter and disagreeing with Paul. Some feel it also suggests that the inhabitants of Galatia at his time were using a gospel or gospels disagreeing with Paul's beliefs, which Gospel of Barnabas could be one of them (although the Gospel of Peter would seem a more natural candidate, as in the light of the second letter.) To Galatian's account we may compare the Introductory Chapter of Gospel of Barnabas, where we read:
"Dearly beloved the great and wonderful God hath during these past days visited us by his prophet Jesus Christ in great mercy of teaching and miracles, by reason whereof many, being deceived of Satan, under presence of piety, are preaching most impious doctrine, calling Jesus son of God, repudiating the circumcision ordained of God for ever, and permitting every unclean meat: among whom also Paul hath been deceived, whereof I speak not without grief; for which cause I am writing that truth which I have seen and heard, in the intercourse that I have had with Jesus, in order that ye may be saved, and not be deceived of Satan and perish in the judgment of God. Therefore beware of every one that preacheth unto you new doctrine contrary to that which I write, that ye may be saved eternally." (Introduction To Gospel of Barnabas)
In this context, supporters also note that Peter was from the original 12 disciples of Jesus, and Barnabas was one of the early disciples of Jesus, while Paul, a Roman, hadn't lived with Jesus, and had been accustomed to persecute his followers before his conversion.
Acts 9:26-27: "And when Saul [Paul] was come to Jerusalem he assayed to join himself to the disciples, but they were all afraid of him and believed not that he was a disciple. But Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles"
From the previous passages, we can also infer that in the beginning, Paul and Barnabas were getting along with each other; however, at the end, they started to depart in their beliefs.
In conclusion, some Muslim scholars believe that those differences between the Gospel of Barnabas and the belief of Paul might be the reason that the Gospel of Barnabas and other gospels were not added to the New Testament.
[edit] Other non-canonical differences
According to the following quote, Jesus talked to Barnabas and gave him a "secret":
Jesus, weeping, said: "O Barnabas, it is necessary that I should reveal to you great secrets, which, after that I shall be departed from the world, you shall reveal to it." Then answered he that writes, weeping, and said: "Suffer me to weep, O master, and other men also, for that we are sinners. And you, that are a holy one and prophet of God, it is not fitting for you to weep so much."
Jesus answered: "Believe me, Barnabas that I cannot weep as much as I ought. For if men had not called me God, I should have seen God here as he will be seen in paradise, and should have been safe not to fear the day of judgment. But God knows that I am innocent, because never have I harboured thought to be held more than a poor slave. No, I tell you that if I had not been called God I should have been carried into paradise when I shall depart from the world, whereas now I shall not go thither until the judgment. Now you see if I have cause to weep.
Know, O Barnabas, that for this I must have great persecution, and shall be sold by one of my disciples for thirty pieces of money. Whereupon I am sure that he who shall sell me shall be slain in my name, for that God shall take me up from the earth, and shall change the appearance of the traitor so that every one shall believe him to be me; nevertheless, when he dies an evil death, I shall abide in that dishonour for a long time in the world. But when Muhammad shall come, the sacred Messenger of God, that infamy shall be taken away. And this shall God do because I have confessed the truth of the Messiah who shall give me this reward, that I shall be known to be alive and to be a stranger to that death of infamy."
Also according to GoB, Jesus charged Barnabas to write the gospel:
Jesus turned himself to him who writes, and said: "Barnabas, see that by all means you write my gospel concerning all that has happened through my dwelling in the world. And write in a similar manner that which has befallen Judas, in order that the faithful may be undeceived, and every one may believe the truth."
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Ryukyu - Early Malaysian & Japanese Relationship
Pada hari ini 11.04.1480, Laksamana Melaka, iaitu Hang Tuah telah menyerahkan sepucuk surat kepada Raja Negeri Ryukyu di Negeri Jepun mengenai sebuah kapal Ryukyu yang terdampar di pantai Chio-Chih ataupun Annam Utara. Kapal tersebut yang pada mulanya bermaksud untuk mendapatkan air dikatakan telah terlibat dalam satu pergaduhan berdarah dengan orang-orang Chio-Chih. Laksamana Hang Tuah telah mendapat tahu mengenai kejadian itu Ialu menghantar satu pasukan penyiasat ke Chan-Cheng iaitu Champa yang di bawah kuasa Annam, untuk menyiasat kejadian tersebut. Setelah disiasat dengan teliti, Pasukan Penyiasat ini mendapati bahawa kejadian itu tidaklah benar. Mereka hanya menemui dua orang Ryukyu, salah seorang daripadanya telah mati kerana sakit. Selain dari itu surat Laksamana Hang Tuah juga melaporkan mengenai:-
1. Rombongan dagang raja Negeri Ryukyu termasuk seorang penterjemah bernama Tei Raku telah sampai ke Melaka dan setelah menjalankan perniagaan dengan aman telah kembali semula ke Ryukyu.
2. Laksamana Hang Tuah telah memohon diberi sebilah pedang, sebatang busar anak panah, dan sebuah pelana.
3. Kapal-kapal Ryukyu yang datang berniaga di Melaka semakin bertambah pada tiap-tiap tahun dan sentiasa memberi hadiah kepada raja dan pembesar Melaka.
4. Laksamana Hang Tuah menyatakan rasa hormat dan kepercayaanya yang tidak akan berubah terhadap raja Ryukyu. Melalui surat ini menunjukkan bahawa perdagangan yang dijalankan oleh Melaka-Ryukyu berjalan dalam keadaan yang baik. Source : http://hids.arkib.gov.my/doc/2005/april/11_04_1480_2005.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)